Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBin Dawood, A; Dickinson, A; Aytemur, A; Milne, E; Jones, M
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-02T06:37:32Z
dc.date.available2023-03-02T06:37:32Z
dc.date.issuedMAY
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12481/14124
dc.description.abstractEvidence suggests that the visual evoked potential (VEP) and gamma oscillations elicited by visual stimuli reflect the balance of excitatory and inhibitory (E-I) cortical processes. As tDCS has been shown to modulate E-I balance, the current study investigated whether amplitudes of VEP components (N1 and P2) and peak gamma frequency are modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Healthy adults underwent two electroencephalography (EEG) recordings while viewing stimuli designed to elicit a robust visual response. Between the two recordings, participants were randomly assigned to three tDCS conditions (anodal-, cathodal-, and sham-tDCS) or received no-tDCS. tDCS electrodes were placed over the occipital cortex (Oz) and the left cheek with an intensity of 2 mA for 10 min. Data of 39 participants were analysed for VEP amplitudes and peak gamma frequency using mixed-model ANOVAs. The results showed no main effects of tDCS in any metric. Possible explanations for the absence of tDCS effects are discussed.
dc.titleNo effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on visual evoked potential and peak gamma frequency
dc.title.alternativeCOGNITIVE PROCESSING
dc.identifier.DOI-ID10.1007/s10339-022-01076-3
dc.identifier.volume23
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage235
dc.identifier.endpage254
dc.identifier.issn/e-issn1612-4782
dc.identifier.issn/e-issn1612-4790


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record