Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIzol, V; Gokalp, F; Sozen, S; Ozden, E; Bayazit, Y; Muezzinoglu, T; Kara, O; Cetin, S; Gulsen, M; Turkeri, L; Tansug, MZ
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-02T06:38:33Z
dc.date.available2023-03-02T06:38:33Z
dc.date.issuedMAY
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12481/14258
dc.description.abstractPurpose To compare the functional outcomes of patients who underwent partial (PN) or radical nephrectomy (RN) for clinical T1 (cT1) renal tumours using the Kidney Cancer Database of the Urooncology Association, Turkey. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 1004 patients who underwent PN and RN for cT1 renal tumours at multiple academic tertiary centres between 2000 and 2018. Patients with preoperative end-stage chronic kidney disease and/or metastatic disease were excluded. Results There were 452 patients in the PN group and 552 patients in the RN group. The median follow-ups were 74.9 and 83.7 months in RN and PN cohort. The eGFR was significantly reduced in both groups on postoperative day 1 (PN = 13.7 vs RN = 19.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2): P < .001). In the PN group, eGFR showed a tendency to recover according to a quadratic pattern and reached preoperative levels in the first and third years (95.6 +/- 28.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and 96.9 +/- 28.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively), with no significant difference between the eGFRs in the 1st and 3rd years (P = .710). To define groups at risk, different cut-off values for the GFR were considered. Among patients with a baseline GFR < 90, the RN cohort had significantly lower eGFRs in the first and third years than the PN cohort (P = .02). Logistic regression showed that comorbidities, coronary artery disease, diabetes and hypertension had no adverse impacts on the changes in the eGFR (P = .60, P = .13, and P = .13, respectively). Conclusion For the treatment of stage T1 kidney tumours, open or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has the benefit to preserve renal function.
dc.titleFactors affecting long-term renal functions after partial vs radical nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal masses: A Multicentre Study of the Urooncology Association, Turkey
dc.title.alternativeINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE
dc.identifier.DOI-ID10.1111/ijcp.13960
dc.identifier.volume75
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.issn/e-issn1368-5031
dc.identifier.issn/e-issn1742-1241


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record