| dc.contributor.author | Erol, C; Sendur, MAN; Bilgetekin, I; Garbioglu, DB; Hamdard, J; Akbas, S; Hizal, M; Arslan, C; Sevinc, A; Kucukarda, A; Erdem, D; Kahraman, S; Cakir, E; Demirkiran, A; On, S; Dogan, I; Erdogan, AP; Koca, S; Kubilay, P; Eren, OO; Cilbir, E; Celik, E; Araz, M; Ozyukseler, DT; Yildirim, ME; Bahceci, A; Taskaynatan, H; Oyman, A; Deniz, GI; Menekse, S; Kut, E; Gulmez, A; Sakin, A; Nayir, E; Acar, R; Sen, E; Inal, A; Turhal, S; Kaya, AO; Paydas, S; Tastekin, D; Hacibekiroglu, I; Cincin, I; Bilici, A; Mandel, NM; Dede, DS; Akinci, MB; Oksuzoglu, B; Uncu, D; Yalcin, B; Artac, M | |
| dc.description.abstract | Aims: The addition of aflibercept to the fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) previously treated with oxaliplatin. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line FOLFIRI and aflibercept combination in patients with metastatic CRC in real-life experience. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and thirty-three patients who treated with FOLFIRI and aflibercept in the second-line were included in the study. The clinical and pathological features of the patients were recorded retrospectively. Survival (overall and progression-free survival [PFS]), response rates, and safety data were analyzed. Results: The median age was 61. Majority of patients (87.5%) received first-line bevacizumab and 10.1% of patients received anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents. About 80% of patients had KRAS, 18.6% of patients had NRAS, and 6.4% of patients had BRAF mutations. The median OS was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6-12.6) and the median PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 5.5-6.5). About 4.6% of patients had complete response and 30.6% of patients had partial response as best tumor response. Grade 1-2 toxicities were seen in 33.4% of patients, while grade 3-4 toxicities were recorded in 27% of patients. Eight patients (2%) died due to treatment toxicity. Conclusions: Overall and PFS were similar in routine clinical practice compared to phase III pivotal VELOUR trial. However, response rates were found to be higher. It was observed that there were fewer adverse events compared to the VELOUR trial. | |
