Comparison of prolene and progrip meshes in inguinal hernia repair in terms of post-operative pain, limitation of movement and quality of life

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to compare the techniques applying prolene mesh and progrip-self fixating mesh in terms of post-operative pain, limitation of movement and quality of life.Material and Methods: The study was conducted from November 2014 to January 2016 in Department of Surgery, Manisa Celal Bayar University Hospital. The study recruited 50 male patients, aged 18 and over and was carried out as a double blinded procedure. Twenty-five patients were randomlyselected to receive hernia repair by progrip self-fixating mesh and 25 patients were treated with hernia repair with suture fixation method by usingprolene grafts, and patients’ pain follow-up was performed with face-to-face or telephone interviews with VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) and return todaily routine activities were evaluated with SF-36 (Short Form-36) quality of life scale. Recurrent hernias and emergency cases were excluded.Results: The pain scores were lower and a statistically significant difference was achieved in patients in whom progrip self-fixating mesh was used in theearly postoperative period. Both methods gave statistically similar results in terms of pain and quality of life.Conclusion: In the literature, there are some evidence that the repair applied with progrip self-fixating graft has more positive outcomes compared tothe repairs applied with suture fixation. It is concluded that there is a need for longer follow-ups and larger series of cases in order to achieve a definiteresult.