Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLipska-Zietkiewicz, BS; Iatropoulos, P; Maranta, R; Caridi, G; Ozaltin, F; Anarat, A; Balat, A; Gellermann, J; Trautmann, A; Erdogan, O; Saeed, B; Emre, S; Bogdanovic, R; Azocar, M; Balasz-Chmielewska, I; Benetti, E; Caliskan, S; Mir, S; Melk, A; Ertan, P; Baskin, E; Jardim, H; Davitaia, T; Wasilewska, A; Drozdz, D; Szczepanska, M; Jankauskiene, A; Higuita, LMS; Ardissino, G; Ozkaya, O; Kuzma-Mroczkowska, E; Soylemezoglu, O; Ranchin, B; Medynska, A; Tkaczyk, M; Peco-Antic, A; Akil, I; Jarmolinski, T; Firszt-Adamczyk, A; Dusek, J; Simonetti, GD; Gok, F; Gheissari, A; Emma, F; Krmar, RT; Fischbach, M; Printza, N; Simkova, E; Mele, C; Ghiggeri, GM; Schaefer, F
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-01T08:40:07Z
dc.date.available2020-07-01T08:40:07Z
dc.date.issuedJUL
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12481/7412
dc.description.abstractGenetic screening paradigms for congenital and infantile nephrotic syndrome are well established; however, screening in adolescents has received only minor attention. To help rectify this, we analyzed an unselected adolescent cohort of the international PodoNet registry to develop a rational screening approach based on 227 patients with nonsyndromic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome aged 10-20 years. Of these, 21% had a positive family history. Autosomal dominant cases were screened for WT1, TRPC6, ACTN4, and INF2 mutations. All other patients had the NPHS2 gene screened, and WT1 was tested in sporadic cases. In addition, 40 sporadic cases had the entire coding region of INF2 tested. Of the autosomal recessive and the sporadic cases, 13 and 6%, respectively, were found to have podocin-associated nephrotic syndrome, and 56% of them were compound heterozygous for the nonneutral p.R229Q polymorphism. Four percent of the sporadic and 10% of the autosomal dominant cases had a mutation in WT1. Pathogenic INF2 mutations were found in 20% of the dominant but none of the sporadic cases. In a large cohort of adolescents including both familial and sporadic disease, NPHS2 mutations explained about 7% and WT1 4% of cases, whereas INF2 proved relevant only in autosomal dominant familial disease. Thus, screening of the entire coding sequence of NPHS2 and exons 8-9 of WT1 appears to be the most rational and cost-effective screening approach in sporadic juvenile steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.
dc.titleGenetic screening in adolescents with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome
dc.title.alternativeKIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
dc.identifier.DOI-ID10.1038/ki.2013.93
dc.identifier.volume84
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage206
dc.identifier.endpage213
dc.identifier.issn/e-issn0085-2538
dc.identifier.issn/e-issn1523-1755


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record